International language learners should be exposed to slang in the classroom and this is why…. — ScienceDaily

Incredibly, suggests Sascha Stollhans, of the Department of Languages and Cultures at Lancaster College, who argues that standardised language norms are synthetic and language learners really should study about all aspects of language, even the controversial types.

In his coverage paper, just published in the Languages, Modern society & Coverage Journal, he says:

• There are concerns among gurus that introducing learners to ‘non-standard’ language could guide to ambiguity and confusion and that students may well be penalised for applying it in assessments.
• Linguistic variation is a abundant space of examine that can appeal to language learners and have a positive impact on enthusiasm.
• Attitudes to language norms and variation in language teaching vary greatly, and current textbooks offer with language variation in quite unique methods

“Language learners will have to have to be capable to realize slang and dialect when mixing with so-called ‘native’ speakers — which is a lot easier than ever in this electronic age — just consider a glance at the language utilized on Twitter,” says Mr Stollhans, a Senior Training Associate in German Scientific studies at Lancaster.

“Far more than that, in the Uk, exactly where university-centered language mastering has been in crisis mode for a while now, learning far more about the varied strategies in which ‘native speakers’ in distinct sites and contexts talk could be just the way to get college students inspired and interested.

“This approach can be really imaginative and notify us a whole lot about other cultures. It can also be an important move in the direction of a far more various and inclusive curriculum. After all, language norms are frequently political and historical, and there are a variety of speakers of a language.”

The paper can make concrete suggestions for policy-makers, publishers, authors of studying elements, examination boards and instructor teaching suppliers.

It urges:

• Curriculum leaders and teachers in the United kingdom to make it their mission to enlighten learners about the rich and dynamic sorts of variation a language involves when mastering their very first language — the very first action to learning the complexity of other languages
• Examination boards to acknowledge the use of non-typical variations in checks and examinations, in acceptable contexts
• Trainer coaching to consist of appropriate linguistics features to sensitise lecturers to troubles close to variation and equip them with the suggests to be in a position to make knowledgeable choices about the inclusion of language kinds in their instructing. This is a little something Mr Stollhans has been campaigning for with the countrywide “Linguistics in Present day International Languages” network.

The policy paper is section of a special assortment of plan papers on “Language inequality in education, legislation and citizenship” that follows on from a assembly which introduced alongside one another lecturers with practitioners — lecturers, examiners, dictionary-makers, speech therapists, legislators, translators, lobbyists, coverage-makers, and other individuals — to look at how assumptions and beliefs about correct, appropriate or common languages impact on day-to-day everyday living in a multilingual world.

The conference, for which Mr Stollhans was invited to chair the schooling panel, was component of the Arts and Humanities Study Council-funded MEITS venture.

Story Resource:

Components provided by Lancaster College. Observe: Content could be edited for model and length.